[email protected]

Make an Appointment


  1. Home
  2. Crushing Plant
  3. capital cost of 120 tph stone crusher

capital cost of 120 tph stone crusher

This appendix presents additional details on the individual processes that are involved in extraction of coal from surface and underground mines, and the subsequent beneficiation of the coal in coal processing plants to produce a final product

Inquiry Online

appendix e: coal mining and processing methods | coal

In surface mining, the ground covering the coal seam (the overburden) is first removed to expose the coal seam for extraction. The elements of a surface mining operation are (1) topsoil removal and storage for later use, (2) drilling and blasting the strata overlying the coal seam, (3) loading and transporting this fragmented overburden material (called spoil), (4) drilling and blasting the coal seam, (5) loading and transporting the coal, (6) backfilling with spoil and grading, (7) spreading top soil over the graded area, (8) establishing vegetation and ensuring control of soil erosion and water quality, and (9) releasing the area for other purposes (Figure E.1). Steep topography, a steeply dipping seam, or multiple seams, all present challenging problems for designing stable slopes and productive operations in surface mining situations

Surface topography controls which of the surface mining methods—contour mining, area strip mining, or open-pit mining—is employed (see Figure 4.3). These differ principally in the methods employed for loading, transporting, and storing the spoil. Contour mines are common in the hilly Appalachian terrain of the eastern United States where the fragmented overburden has to be transported

outside the mining area for placement and storage. In the Midwest, where the surface topography and coal seams are generally flat, it is common to employ area strip mining in which the fragmented overburden is placed directly by large draglines in the space created where coal has been mined (Figure E.1). In some situations in the eastern United States, a coal seam occurring near the top of mountains is exposed by removing the top of the mountain (Figure 4.3) and transporting the fragmented overburden to a nearby valley

appendix e: coal mining and processing methods | coal

Underground mining is usually by the room-and-pillar mining or longwall mining method (Figure E.2). Even in mines where the longwall method is the principal extraction method, the development of the mine and the longwall panels is accomplished by room-and-pillar continuous mining. The thickness of the coal seam, the depth and inclination of the coal seam, the nature of roof and floor strata, and the amount of gas contained both in the coal seam and the roof and floor strata are all important for selection of the mining method. Mining difficulties are greatly increased if seams are extremely thick or thin or are steeply inclined. Longwall mining additionally requires large coal reserves to justify the capital cost of longwall equipment

As surface mining in the Powder River and Rocky Mountain Basins proceeds, it is likely that the stripping ratios (overburden to coal) will exceed an economic limit. If this coal is to be mined at reasonably high recovery rates, it

FIGURE E.2 Schematic showing underground coal mine workings. The coal seam is accessed by both a slope and a shaft, shown on the right. The ventilation fan arrangement is shown adjacent to the surface opening of the shaft. The shaft has an elevator for lowering and raising miners and materials. Coal gathered from the workings by various conveyors is transported to the surface by the slope conveyor. The surface features shown are the raw coal storage silo fed by the slope conveyor, the coal preparation plant (the building on the left), the clean coal storage silos in the front, and the train load out. A longwall section and a room-and-pillar continuous miner section are shown. The room-and-pillar section is a five-entry development with rows of four pillars. The longwall face is between two three-entry developments. SOURCE: CONSOL Energy Inc

appendix e: coal mining and processing methods | coal

will require thick-seam underground mining methods such as large longwalls or multiple slice and/or caving techniques that have not been used in the United States. This will require improvements to mining equipment and practices that are likely to entail research and development (R&D) on mine design, ground control, mine automation, and new systems for protecting worker health and safety

Room-and-Pillar Mining. In the room-and-pillar method, a set of entries, usually between three and eight, are driven into a block of coal. These entries are connected by cross-cuts, which are usually at right angle to the entries. The entries are commonly spaced from 50 to 100 feet apart, and the cross-cuts are usually about 50 to 150 feet apart. The pillars formed by the entries and cross-cuts may be extracted or left standing depending on mining conditions. In the

conventional room and pillar method, several pieces of equipment are used in sequence at a working face to extract the coal. These unit operations include the undercutting, drilling, blasting, loading and roof bolting operations. In the continuous room and pillar method, the unit operations of undercutting, drilling, and blasting are eliminated and the cutting and loading functions are performed by a mechanical machine—the continuous miner. The room-and-pillar method accounts for 50 percent of the underground production in the United States, and continuous mining makes up more than 90 percent of this production. In both conventional and continuous methods, coal is loaded onto coal transport vehicles and then dumped onto a panel-belt conveyor for transport out of the mine. Once the coal has been cut, the strata above the excavated coal seam are supported by roof bolts. Under favorable conditions, the production from a continuous miner section can exceed 800,000 tons per year per continuous miner

appendix e: coal mining and processing methods | coal

Longwall Mining. Longwall mining is an automated form of underground coal mining characterized by high recovery and extraction rates, feasible only in relatively flat-lying, thick, and uniform coal beds. A high-powered cutting machine (the shearer) is passed across the exposed face of coal, shearing away broken coal, which is continuously hauled away by a floor-level conveyor system (Figure E.2). Longwall mining extracts all machine-minable coal between the floor and ceiling within a contiguous block of coal, known as a panel, leaving no support pillars within the panel area. Panel dimensions vary over time and with mining conditions but currently average about 900 feet wide (coal face width) and more than 8,000 feet long (the minable extent of the panel, measured in the direction of mining). Longwall mining is done under movable roof supports that are advanced as the bed is cut. The roof in the mined-out area is allowed to fall as the mining advances (EIA, 2007b). The use of longwall mining in underground production has been growing in terms of both amount and percentages, increasing from less than 10 percent of underground production (less than 10 million annual tons) in the late 1960s, to about 50 percent of underground production (more than 200 million annual tons) at present. The production from a longwall mine today (one longwall section and two or three continuous miner sections) can exceed 7 million tons per year. With a second longwall and the necessary complement of continuous miners, production from an underground longwall mine can be well over 10 millions tons per year

The composition of coals mined in different areas can vary widely (Table 4.2). Since the very early days of mining, coal quality has been improved by removing unwanted mineral matter. Over this time, coal preparation plants have evolved considerably, from simple size segregation in the early twentieth century, into lump coal for domestic use and intermediate sizes for industrial use. The fines were rejected as unfit for use, leading to a substantial quantity of coal refuse

(“waste coal” or “gob” piles) particularly in the eastern states. The first washing methods were imported from Europe, The “Chance” washer, in which the density differences between coal and mineral matter was exploited to clean raw coal was introduced in 1918. The Chance washer utilized sand and water as a medium. Today, the “heavy-media” process using magnetite is standard for coarse coal cleaning. Attempts to recover middlings and fine coal have continued through the years, and near the middle of the twentieth century, processes to wash and recover fine coal resulted in the introduction of equipment such as centrifuges, froth flotation cells, disc filters, thickeners, cyclones, and thermal dryers

appendix e: coal mining and processing methods | coal

Crushing and breaking. Run-of-mine coal must be crushed to an acceptable top size for treatment in the preparation plant. Typical crushing and breaking devices are feeder breakers, rotary breakers, hammer mills, and roll crushers

Sizing. Different cleaning processes are used on different sizes of coal. Therefore raw coal entering the plant will be screened (sieved) into three or four sizes. Clean coal is rarely sized, except for some industrial markets

Storage and stockpiling. Coal is stored in silos or stockpiled before and after cleaning. Raw coal is stored between the mine and the preparation plant, and clean coal is stored between the preparation plant and product loadout. This is done to provide surge capacity at the interface between the mine and the plant, and between the plant and the loadout, to maintain workable product inventories, and in some cases to control the quality of coal going to a given customer by segregating different products

appendix e: coal mining and processing methods | coal

Density separation. Raw coal consists of organic and mineral matter components, with specific gravities ranging from 1.30 for the lighter organic material to 2.5 for rock. Coal is cleaned by separating the lower-density organic material from the higher-density refuse. In heavy-media separations, the specific gravity of the medium used for separation, usually a suspension of finely divided magnetite in water, is chosen to achieve a given degree of separation depending on the characteristics of the coal, the desired product quality, and the acceptable level of coal loss to the rejects. In water-only devices such as jigs, spirals, and water-only cyclones, separation is effected by the differential acceleration of coal and mineral particles in water

Froth flotation. Fine coal particles (i.e., smaller than 0.5 mm) are difficult to separate from mineral matter on a density basis and this fraction usually is cleaned by froth flotation. Froth flotation is a physiochemical process that exploits the selectivity of the attachment of air bubbles to organic coal particle surfaces and in the nonattachment to mineral constituents. Surfactants are used to create a hydrophobic surface on the coal particles to be floated, and a “collector,” typically fuel oil, is used to promote agglomeration of the floated particles to facilitate their removal

Coal drying. Coal preparation plants that employ fine coal cleaning by froth flotation can produce an unacceptable amount of moisture in the product. Thermal drying, in which the wet coal is dried in the hot gas generated by a coal-or gas-fired burner, is used in some plants to reduce the moisture content

appendix e: coal mining and processing methods | coal

Refuse and tailings management. Waste management is an integral part of coal preparation. Coarse refuse is transported to the solids disposal area, where it can form a tailings impoundment or be placed in a suitable landfill. Tailings (fine solid waste in water) are usually transported by pipeline to an impoundment area where the tailings settle out; the clarified water is reused in the plant

Each year, Coal Age magazine conducts a census of coal preparation plants in the United States (Fiscor, 2005). The overall findings of the survey (summarized in Table E.1) are generally accepted within the industry as a reasonably accurate reflection of the condition of the coal preparation industry. According to the Coal Age article, “plants reported an average recovery rate of 57%.” Given the total raw coal capacity of the surveyed plants (158,187 tons per hour), this corresponds to a clean-coal capacity of 790 million tons per year, assuming 24/7 operation

five years to 2005 (Fiscor, 2005). The survey notes that “while they employ new equipment, technology, and circuitry, U.S. prep plants have in general remained essentially the same. The typical U.S. prep plant employs heavy media separation and was built in 1983. It has a raw capacity between 500 and 1,000 tons per hour. Although more plants are employing large diameter cyclones, the plants still rely mainly on heavy-media vessels for primary separation and heavy media cyclones for intermediate separation. For fine coal recovery, the plants prefer spirals. Centrifugal dryers are popular. On the technology side, the industry has not embraced online analysis on a widespread basis, but it has adopted the use of PLCs extensively” (Fiscor, 2005).1

appendix e: coal mining and processing methods | coal

Coal will continue to provide a major portion of energy requirements in the United States for at least the next several decades. It is imperative that accurate information describing the amount, location, and quality of the coal resources and reserves be available to fulfill energy needs. It is also important that the United States extract its coal resources efficiently, safely, and in an environmentally responsible manner. A renewed focus on federal support for coal-related research, coordinated across agencies and with the active participation of the states and industrial sector, is a critical element for each of these requirements

Coal focuses on the research and development needs and priorities in the areas of coal resource and reserve assessments, coal mining and processing, transportation of coal and coal products, and coal utilization

You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website

appendix e: coal mining and processing methods | coal

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Although the United States has the vast coal resource described in the previous chapter, perhaps as much as 4 trillion tons, the key issue for policy makers is the amount of coal that is economically recoverable. This is not a fixed quantity, but depends on the geological resource, the market price, and the cost of mining. The particular characteristics of the coal mining industry create unique challenges as it endeavors to provide coal to the market at a competitive price, continually improve miner safety and health, and meet environmental and community requirements. This chapter provides a brief description of the characteristics of the coal industry in the United States, presents an overview of coal extraction and processing methods, and discusses the major issues associated with coal mining and processing. A summary of current research activities supported by state and federal agencies provides the context for recommendations for essential future research

The U.S. coal industry serves a vital role in the nation’s economy by producing fuel for more than half of its electricity. Despite the industry’s importance, industry financial data for 2005—the strongest year for the coal industry in recent years—shows that it is a relatively small industry with revenues totaling $20 billion to $25 billion and net income between $1 billion and $2 billion. To put that in perspective, the entire industry taken collectively would rank as about the one-hundredth largest company (in terms of either revenue or net income) on the 2005 “Fortune 500” list, and it is less than 10 percent the size of Wal-Mart

The U.S. coal industry has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last three decades. During this time, coal production has doubled, while the number of active miners has been halved and the number of mines has dropped by a factor of three (Figure 4.1). This has resulted in the concentration of production in a smaller number of larger mines. The 100 largest mines in the country produced 805 million tons of coal in 2004 (72.5 percent of total U.S. production), while employing about 45 percent of the mining workforce (an average of 310 miners per mine) (EIA, 2005d; NMA, 2006a). The remaining approximately 1,300 mines produced 27.5 percent of the nation’s coal while employing 55 percent of the workforce (about 30 miners per mine). Nearly 70 percent of U.S. coal mines, many of which are comparatively small operations, are in Kentucky, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Since the 1970s, there has been a continuous increase in the proportion of coal produced by the western states. At present, states west of the Mississippi account for more than 55 percent of total tons produced (Figure 4.2). Wyoming alone accounts for almost 36 percent of national coal production tonnage (Table 4.1)

Considerable data are compiled on the basis of the union or non-union status of mines throughout the coal industry by the Energy Information Administration (EIA). At present, some 27.5 percent of the total coal mining workforce consists

FIGURE 4.1 Number of coal mines, production tonnage, and miner employment in the U.S. coal industry. Note that the left axis scale represents two parameters, production tonnage and number of mines. SOURCE: Based on data in NMA (2006b)

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

of union members, working at 147 mines (EIA, 2005d). The United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) represents the largest number of workers (16.3 percent of the workforce) and the largest number of mines (131) of any of the unions. The average number of workers at a union mine is 140

A modern coal mine is a highly mechanized industrial plant that has to meet strict standards of engineering design and operation. The size, power, strength, monitoring and control features, and automation of mining equipment dwarf

those of even a few decades ago. Coal mines require substantial capital investment in both permanent structures and depreciable mining equipment, exceeding $75 per annual ton of capacity in large underground coal mines and $30 or more per annual ton for large surface coal mines

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

The overall coal mining process consists of several sequential stages: (1) exploration of a potentially economic coal seam to assess minable reserves, environmental issues, marketable reserves, potential markets, and permitting risks; (2) analysis and selection of a mining plan; (3) securing the markets; (4) developing the mine; (5) extracting the coal; (6) processing the coal if necessary; and (7) decommissioning the mine and releasing the property for post-mining use. The two essential requirements that must be fulfilled before a prospective coal mine can enter the development stage are confirmation that there are sufficient minable reserves of adequate quality with no unacceptable environmental or permitting risks, and confirmation of an assured or contracted market for a substantial fraction of the coal that will be mined

Coal seams can be mined by surface or underground methods (Figure 4.3), with the choice of mining method dictated by both technical and economic factors. The most important technical factors are the thickness of the coal seam, the depth of the coal seam, the inclination of the seam, and the surface topography

Each of these technical factors can set limiting conditions when considering the economic recoverability for a given coal, mining method, and market. The important economic parameters are the relative costs of mining coal by surface and underground methods including costs associated with any site-specific land use constraints, the cost of removing the material above the coal seam in the surface method, and the price of coal. The price for any particular coal is related directly to coal quality (Box 4.1 and Table 4.2). Because more than 90 percent of the coal mined in the United States is used in power plants to generate electricity using steam turbines, the price for steam coal is dependent primarily on its heating value and sulfur content

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Relatively shallow coal deposits are generally extracted by surface mining, and deeper deposits are extracted by underground mining (more detailed descriptions of surface and underground mining processes can be found in Appendix E). There are also situations in which a seam is mined by surface methods first, and then if adequate reserves are still available, the mine is developed for underground extraction. Where remaining reserves are limited, other methods of mining—such as auger mining or highwall mining—may be used

Surface mining has many advantages compared to underground mining. In general, coal recovery is very high (85 to 90+ percent), compared to 40 to 70 percent in underground mines. The productivity of surface mines is generally higher than that of underground mines (Figure 4.4), and health and safety statistics for surface mining are also generally better than those of underground mining. Surface-mined coal from the Powder River Basin is usually simply sized and screened in preparation for market, whereas underground-mined coal and surface-mined coal from the Interior and Appalachian basins often requires a greater amount of processing (see below) to improve its marketability. The cost per ton of mining coal by surface methods is generally lower than that by underground methods

In the United States, in addition to a continuous growth in coal production since the 1960s, there has been a dramatic shift in production from underground mining to surface mining (Figure 1.6). In the Powder River Basin (PRB), where deposits of coal more than 100 feet thick occur close to the surface, individual surface mines can produce more than 90 million tons each year. Underground coal mining is more common east of the Mississippi River, particularly in Appalachia. Some of the largest underground coal mines, each producing around 10 million tons annually, are located in Pennsylvania and West Virginia. The largest underground mining complex in the United States produces about 20 million tons per year

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Bituminous coals in the eastern and central United States are mined by both surface and underground mining methods. Anthracite coal is mined exclusively in northeastern Pennsylvania, also by both underground and surface mining methods. Lignite and subbituminous coal production is centered in a small number of large mines (Table 4.3). Subbituminous coal and lignite comprise about 50

percent of U.S. coal production by tonnage, but because of their lower heating values, only about 40 percent by heating value. The distinction between tonnage and energy content is particularly important when considering possible shifts in coal supply and demand by producing and consuming regions. Subbituminous coals are produced almost exclusively in the PRB of Wyoming and Montana. EIA’s forecasts of increased coal production over the next three decades (see

Although the term coal refers to any readily combustible rock containing more than 50 percent by weight of organic matter, coals differ considerably in their physical and chemical characteristics (Table 4.2) and these differences have pronounced impacts on their value and use. Coals in the United States are classified by “rank,” a method of distinguishing coals on the basis of their fixed carbon content, volatile matter content, heating value, and agglomerating characteristics.1 Coal rank is defined as “the degree of metamorphism, or progressive alteration, in the natural series from lignite to anthracite. Higher-rank coal is classified according to the fixed carbon on a dry basis, lower-rank coal, according to Btu [heating value] on a moist basis” (AGI, 1997).2 Differences in sedimentary depositional environments and differences in the geological history of the coal strata result in differences in mineral matter content and composition, as well as differing concentrations of some of the important minor elements (e.g., sulfur, chlorine). These differing characteristics impact coal utilization in both the electricity generation and metallurgical markets

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

The term coal quality is used to distinguish the range of different commercial steam coals that are produced directly by mining or are produced by coal cleaning.3 Generally, coal quality for steam coals (i.e., coal used for electricity generation) refers to differences in heating value and sulfur content (Table 4.2), although other characteristics such as grindability or ash fusion characteristics are also specified in coal sale agreements. While not as obvious as the impact of sulfur content on environmental emissions, differences in the moisture content and heating values among different coal types affect CO2 emissions upon combustion, with higher-rank bituminous coals producing 7 to 14 percent lower emissions than subbituminous coals on a net calorific value basis (Winschel, 1990)

1This classification is described in American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard D388-77. Standards that are broadly similar, but differ in detail, are used by the international coal trade and some coal mining countries

3Factors considered in judging a coal’s quality are based on, but not limited to, heat value; content of moisture, ash, fixed carbon, phosphate, silica, sulfur, major, minor, and trace elements; coking and petrologic properties; and organic constituents considered both individually and in groups. The individual importance of these factors varies according to the intended use of the coal

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

NOTE: Because of their lower energy contents, lignite and subbituminous coals represent a smaller percentage of coal production in the United States on an energy basis (~40 %) than on a tonnage basis (~50 %)

Chapter 2) rely heavily on increased production from this region for consumption east of the Mississippi River. Because it takes about 50 percent more subbituminous coal (on a tonnage basis) to replace a ton of bituminous coal in electricity generation,1 this has significant implications for transportation infrastructure and power plant design and capacity

When used for electricity generation, coal from the PRB generally produces more CO2 per kilowatt-hour than the bituminous coal mined in the east. Combustion of subbituminous coal from the PRB produces about 226 pounds of CO2 for every million Btu (British thermal units) of heat generated (on a net calorific basis), compared with about 211 pounds for the bituminous coal mined in the East (Winschel, 1990). Another possible constraint on the use of coal from the southern PRB might be future air quality regulation of coarse particulates, although Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) proposal to exempt mining and agricultural operations in its update of particulate standards (EPA, 2006c) may remove or defer this potential constraint

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

An increasingly important by-product of U.S. coal production is coal mine methane recovered during or prior to mining, in addition to coal bed methane produced independently of mining. Captured methane may be used as a fuel source at the mine or, where feasible, distributed in natural gas pipelines. In recent years, coal bed methane production has increased and now comprises about 8 percent of the U.S. natural gas supply. An ancillary benefit of recovering coal mine methane is reduced atmospheric methane emissions, because methane is a potent greenhouse gas

In addition to the difference in heating value (i.e., Btu/lb), electricity generating units fueled with subbituminous and lignite coals tend to operate at lower efficiency (higher heat rate) than units fueled with bituminous coal. This can lead to differences in generating capacity when using different coals

Removal of the mineral matter (or “ash”),3 which is largely noncombustible and may constitute up to 65 percent of the raw coal, increases the heating value of the coal on a mass basis.4 Although some combustible material is lost as part of the cleaning process, the removal of unwanted material reduces the mass and volume of coal for a given heating value thereby reducing shipping costs as well as minimizing coal handling and ash management costs for the end user

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Processing allows greater control over the “quality” of the coal—principally ash and moisture—which improves its consistency for end users, such as electricity generators or coke manufacturers. Improved and consistent quality increases the efficiency and availability of steam boilers and is particularly important for the quality of metallurgical coke

Physical processing (see Appendix E) can, to some extent, reduce sulfur and trace element contents, particularly on a heating value basis. However, generally coal cleaning is not practiced primarily for this purpose except for the metallurgical coal market

The decision whether or not to process a particular raw coal depends on the coal and its intended market. The subbituminous coal of the Powder River Basin is almost always shipped to market raw because it has inherently low ash content and poor “washability,”5 and the region has low water availability—a critical requirement for conventional coal beneficiation

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Most coal preparation plants are in the eastern states, with more than 80 percent of the plants and almost 80 percent of capacity located in West Virginia, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Kentucky (Fiscor, 2005; see Appendix E). The 11 coal preparation plants in the western states are located at bituminous

The terms “coal preparation,” “cleaning,” “washing,” “processing,” and “beneficiation” are used synonymously to refer to physical enrichment of the combustible portion of the coal by selective removal of the noncombustible components, principally mineral matter and water

It is customary to refer to the mineral content of a coal as “ash,” and it is usually reported as such in coal quality descriptions. Ash content is determined by combusting the coal in air and converting the inorganic elements to their oxides

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Commercial coal characteristics, such as heating value, ash, moisture, sulfur, etc., are determined in the United States according to standards established by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), and are usually denominated in English units (e.g., Btu/lb for heating value on a mass basis)

The term “washability” is used to describe the ease with which mineral matter can be separated from the coal, and depends on the degree of incorporation of the mineral matter in the coal’s organic matrix and its specific gravity relative to the coal

coal mines. Wyoming—the largest coal-producing state in the country—has no coal preparation plants, largely because the subbituminous Powder River Basin coal is low in ash. However, PRB coal has a high level of inherent moisture (~30 percent), which has stimulated some interest in thermal dewatering of the coal to increase its heating value and reduce its transportation costs (see Box 4.2)

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

The conditions that will be encountered in future coal mines will undoubtedly be different from those of today—the more easily mined coal has already been extracted. As shallower coal is depleted and seams with greater amounts of overburden6 are mined, surface mining will become more expensive because stripping ratios7 will increase and multiple benches8 will be needed. This will increase the number of unit operations and the associated cost. In underground mining, the mines of the future will have to access seams that are deeper, thinner, or thicker, often with higher gas content and potentially with greater ground-control issues. Overlying or underlying seams may have been mined, or it may be necessary to mine multiple seams simultaneously to meet increased production requirements. These more difficult mining situations will have an effect on economic decisions related to mine profitability, on the health and safety of mine workers as they encounter more challenging or different mining requirements, on the technical ability to mine, and on the management of waste materials generated by mining

Small mines (i.e., with annual production less than 2 million tons), which currently produce more than 25 percent of coal in the United States, play an important role in ensuring adequate coal supply because they have historically started and ceased production as demand and prices fluctuate. They also play a critical role in fully utilizing national coal resources, particularly those resources that may not be mined by larger operations.9 The population of small coal mines has been decreasing and is projected to continue to decline. However, small mines will continue to exist, and the technical and societal issues they will face in the future should be considered in agency plans

Combined reserves of subbituminous coal and lignite (known as “brown coal” in the international coal trade) make up approximately one-half of the world coal reserves and about one-half of the coal resources of the United States. These coals are rarely processed before shipment or use. However, the oxygen and moisture contents of low-rank coals are greater than those of bituminous coals. This reduces the heating value of the coal as mined, which increases the transportation cost on a heating value basis and reduces the thermal efficiency of the steam boilers that use these coals. Most lignite mined in the United States is used in minemouth plants. Subbituminous coals, however, are generally transported considerable distances, so their high moisture content and low heating value add to the effective transportation cost and environmental impact. One way to offset these disadvantages is to dry the coal before transportation or utilization

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Numerous processes for drying low-rank coals to upgrade them have been proposed, demonstrated (e.g., Great River Energy Lignite Drying Process; Bullinger et al., 2006), and in a few cases, commercialized (e.g., K-Fuels Process; Kowalski, 2005). The characteristics of dried low-rank coal—it is friable, has a tendency to spontaneously heat, and readily reabsorbs moisture—constitute major obstacles that must be overcome to produce a saleable, transportable, dry coal product

the severity of diseases, disasters, fatal accidents, and nonfatal accidents—the health and safety of miners remain a major concern for government, industry, and labor. As the coal mine disasters in early 2006 demonstrated (MSTTC, 2006), the safe operation of mines remains a major challenge—there needs to be constant monitoring and control of health and safety threats as well as continuous safety training and improvements in operating practices

Past experience has shown that changes in mining operations or practices (e.g., introduction of new equipment and systems, mining of virgin areas, infusion of new workers) all have the potential to create a more hazardous environment. Similarly, experience has shown that adequate engineering controls and a knowledgeable workforce are the prerequisites for a safer work environment. Continued health and safety research is needed to identify new hazards and hazard sources as well as to improve the engineering controls for existing hazards, particularly through the development of reliable monitoring and intelligent control systems. The likelihood of deeper mines in the future means that there has to be increased attention to methane control (including methane capture before, during, or after mining), dust control, ignition sources, fires, and explosions. Recent disasters have shown that there are major knowledge gaps and technology needs in the areas of escape and survival, and emergency preparedness and rescue, emphasizing the need for research to develop systematic and comprehensive

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

risk management protocols that can then be applied to individual mines (MSTTC, 2006). In addition, since powered haulage and machinery now have the dubious honor of surpassing ground-control incidents (e.g., roof falls) as the major source of accidents in mines, there is a clear need for better understanding of the hazards that are likely to be encountered as equipment sizes and operational conditions change. New technology for better geological characterization as part of mine planning, better monitoring sensors, and increased remote control and automation of mining equipment have the potential to decrease miners’ exposure to hazardous conditions. Mining of deeper seams, multiple seams, thicker seams, and seams underlying or overlying mined-out seams will all require a greater understanding of strata control aspects. The risks associated with mining coal seams adjacent to previously mined-out seams, with their actual or potential void spaces, emphasize the need for accurate, comprehensive, and readily available mine maps showing the distribution of older mine workings

Adequate information on the nature and characteristics of a coal seam prior to mining is vitally important for safe and efficient mine operations. Any unexpected anomalies in a coal seam and associated strata, such as sand channels, washouts, faults, and roof instability, can substantially impair mining productivity and create safety hazards. Research to devise improved techniques for imaging coal seams and associated strata, including coal quality parameters, prior to and during mining is needed for mine planning, permitting, and operations (NRC, 2002b). The Martin County coal impoundment failure (NRC, 2002a) and the Quecreek inundation (PDEP, 2002) illustrated the need for increased accuracy and reliability of the geological information used for mine and mine facilities planning

At present, the drilling and blasting required for overburden fragmentation is the major limitation on increased surface mining productivity, and the development of improved rock fragmentation practices is an essential requirement for increased surface mine production. For underground mining, the increased use of longwall mining (see Appendix E) offers the greatest potential for higher productivity. While deeper reserves will be ideal for the increased application of longwalls, a number of limitations to the current production potential of longwalls, in particular the need for better roof support and improved coal haulage systems, must be overcome. Other areas in which the development of advanced technologies offers considerable potential for increased productivity are the continuous monitoring of produced coal and the development of improved remote control, automatic control, and autonomous systems

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Selective mining and blending are two practices that have been advocated to decrease the handling of unnecessary waste during mining and processing, and to increase the utilization of all coals for a range of purposes. While the bulk

Even when exploration shows promise of an economically minable deposit, the elapsed time from first investment in planning until a mine enters full production, after passing through the permitting, construction, and marketing processes, can take anywhere from seven to fifteen years for a large operation. Although smaller operations in established coal mining districts may take less time, two to five years is normal even in these situations. This time delay can significantly impact the economic feasibility of opening a new mine and will have to be minimized if the higher production scenarios for the future are to be achieved

Research to improve coal processing has considerable potential to optimize the use of the nation’s coal resources by increasing production and productivity and improving environmental protection. The effect of improved marginal economics by increasing coal recovery can be significant—in one case, a study showed that a 1 percent increase in recovery of coal could increase profits by 25 percent.10 This could have the effect of making an uneconomic reserve available for production, thus extending the nation’s economic reserve base

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

There are large volumes of western bituminous coals with high ash content (>20 percent) that cannot be cleaned by conventional methods because there are insufficient water resources where the coal is mined to permit conventional wet coal processing. Also, a considerable amount of surface-mined subbituminous coal is lost because of out-of-seam dilution with mineral matter—an annual loss of as much as 10 million tons was reported for the Arch Coal Black Thunder Mine (which produces about 80 million tons per year).11 The development of dry coal beneficiation processes designed for these coals could greatly increase recoverable reserves

Improved coal processing also offers the potential to minimize existing environmental problems and potential future issues. There is approximately 2 billion tons of waste fine coal in “gob” piles resulting from past processing techniques in eastern bituminous coal fields—Pennsylvania alone reports more than 250 million tons of waste coal (McGinty, 2004). Many of these piles are environmental liabilities being dealt with under the federal Abandoned Mine Land reclamation program, but a growing number are being viewed as potential opportunities for utilization. Pennsylvania has 14 sites at which circulating

Improved coal processing also offers potential for responding to future environmental requirements. For example, the development of new or modified flotation processes permit fuel oil to be replaced as a froth flotation collector if it is prohibited because of disposal concerns

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

There are two technical areas where the development of improved coal processing technologies offers the greatest potential to increase resource recovery (Peterson et al., 2001; NRC, 2002b; CAST, 2003):

Existing Mine Operations. There is still an incomplete understanding of how strata behave after coal is extracted from both surface and underground mines, and the hydrologic consequences of mining are not fully understood. For surface mining, the properties of the altered subsurface—particularly the leaching and permeability characteristics—are likely to be different compared to those existing prior to mining. For underground mining, the collapse of strata above a coal seam into the mined void can propagate all the way to the surface, damaging buildings and disrupting the quantity and quality of surface and subsurface water flows

Disposal of mine waste can be a significant problem, particularly where the coal has to be cleaned before shipment (e.g., see NRC, 1975; 1981; 2002a; 2006). There is a need for enhanced understanding of the physical and chemical behavior of spoil stored in valleys or waste—from coal combustion or coal preparation plants—that is disposed in surface or underground mines. Waste management is a major problem where land either is not available or is more valuable for other productive uses. Increased research to develop productive uses of mine waste offers considerable potential to reduce waste disposal issues

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Mine Decommissioning and Closure. Federal regulations for decommissioning and closure of mining operations are administered by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), and the EPA—in some cases state and local governments

have additional requirements. The major decommissioning and closure activities are (1) sealing of all access to underground mine areas, (2) removal of all surface facilities, and (3) reclamation of surface mine areas (generally carried out concurrently with mining operations) and the surface areas of underground mines. Underground and surface coal mines present different challenges for decommissioning and closure. The critical factors in underground mining are the effects of subsidence and hydrology, both of which require continued monitoring and control. For surface mines, the critical factors relate to drainage and treatment of water and to erosion and sedimentation of the slopes, the waste and spoil banks, and the final pit. Continued use of the surface mine infrastructure (e.g., roads, buildings, utilities) depends to a large extent on the post-mining requirements described in the mining plan. A mining plan that is well integrated with a community master plan can result in optimum post-mining use of this infrastructure

Abandoned Mined Lands. A range of environmental issues (e.g., subsidence, fires, acid mine drainage, waste disposal sites, derelict lands) associated with abandoned mined land (AML) continues to cause major concerns and threats to the health, safety, and general welfare of communities. This problem is particularly acute in the older coal mining districts of the eastern United States, specifically in the Appalachian hill country. Although mine closure today is a rigorously regulated process requiring detailed technical and financial analysis during the planning and operation stages for a mine—and ensuring financial and legal responsibility for post-mining closure—the nation continues to grapple with the effects of past mining practices. Additional research is required to develop and demonstrate more effective and sustainable solutions to the problems of acid mine drainage, mine fires, and the utilization of waste piles from AML sites

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Coal mining research and development (R&D) are carried out by a range of organizations and entities—federal government agencies, state government agencies, equipment manufacturers, academic institutions, and industry. In general, the scope of and motivation for research are determined by the relevance and potential impact of the problems that need to be dealt with by these various stakeholders. Industry participants in mining research include individual companies and mining company associations

While the federal government continues to have extensive involvement in the regulation of the coal mining industry, its support for mining research has decreased substantially over the past 10 years. At present, federal research is focused primarily on health and safety. Some research is being done on environmental issues, but support for research aimed at advanced mining technologies

Engineering and Technology Development. The now-defunct Mining Industry of the Future (IOF) program, administered by the Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, supported engineering and technology development with a focus on improving the energy efficiency, resource utilization, and competitiveness of the mining industry. Although not exclusively focused on extraction or on coal mining, many of the program outputs were applicable to the extraction phase of the coal fuel cycle. At present, coal extraction receives no support from the DOE-Office of Fossil Energy (FE) Coal R&D program, which is focused primarily on utilization aspects (see Chapter 6)

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Relatively little is being done by the federal government to address coal preparation issues. The Mining IOF program funded some work that was relevant to minerals separation (as part of a much broader program and not exclusively coal related), but new funding for this program (never more than $5 million per year) has been terminated and the program is being closed out. DOE-FE had a solid fuels program, although it tended to fund more advanced work—such as chemical coal cleaning—than processes related to conventional coal preparation. However, there has been no administration request for funding for this area in recent years, and the program is essentially defunct. Some research programs addressing a variety of mineral separation issues (i.e., not exclusive to coal) have been funded at the federal level through small direct congressional appropriations

There is a low level of support for fundamental research in the earth sciences and engineering disciplines (geosciences, material sciences, rock mechanics, etc.) by the National Science Foundation that has potential applications in the development of improved technologies for the coal industry

Health and Safety. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Mining Program is the principal focus for mining health and safety research (NRC, 2007b), consolidated at the Pittsburgh and Spokane research centers. The NIOSH Mining Program has seven areas of health and safety research activity, addressing respiratory diseases, hearing loss, cumulative musculoskeletal injuries, traumatic injuries, disaster prevention, rock safety engineering, and surveillance and training. NIOSH and MSHA appear to work closely together to prioritize health and safety research, with NIOSH carrying out the R&D in response to the regulatory environment established by MSHA. The 2005 NIOSH budget for mine health and safety research ($30 million) represents a decrease of approximately $12 million in nominal dollars for health and safety research compared to 1994-1995 funding

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Reclamation and Rehabilitation of Abandoned Mined Lands. The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement was established in the Department of the Interior in 1977 following passage of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA), with the primary role of regulating surface

coal mining. Among the stated purposes of SMCRA were to support research, training programs, and the establishment of research and training centers in the states on various aspects of mineral production. Although the involvement of OSM with aspects of extraction research is minimal, OSM does have limited technical and applied science activities in support of its regulatory mission. In particular, OSM, in cooperation with the states, plays a major role with regard to the reclamation and rehabilitation of abandoned mined lands

The environmental problems associated with active and abandoned mines and their abatement, particularly land reclamation and water quality maintenance, and the proper handling and disposal of the spoils and wastes from mining operations (e.g., mountain top coal mining, coal combustion residues), also receive regulatory attention from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA is also involved in a program to promote the capture and utilization of coal bed methane. Overall, coal mining research in EPA is limited to support for its regulatory role

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Mining Regulation. The Mine Safety and Health Administration, in the Department of Labor, provides technical support and training services to its personnel and to personnel from the mining industry through its Pittsburgh Safety and Health Technology Center and the National Mine Health and Safety Academy. The direct involvement of MSHA in funding mining research is limited because of its primary regulatory role. However, MSHA undertakes field investigations, laboratory studies, and cooperative research activities on health and safety issues in support of its inspection and technical support functions. Further, MSHA evaluates new equipment and materials for use in mines at its Approval and Certification Center. It also supports state miner training activities through its state grants program

State government involvement in coal mining and processing research is primarily dependent on the importance of the mining industry to each particular state. The major coal-producing states—Wyoming, West Virginia, Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, and Illinois—have or have had agencies with specific responsibilities for health, safety, and environmental issues associated with coal mining. Further, mining industry organizations in these states work closely with state agencies to support research programs that address the specific needs of coal reserve estimation and coal mining operations. These state agencies also work with their corresponding federal agencies, particularly for the acquisition of federal grants to support industry’s needs. Some state governments have provided grants for coal processing research in academic departments (e.g., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, University of Kentucky, Southern Illinois University) or at university-affiliated research centers (e.g., University of Kentucky’s Center for Applied Energy Research and West Virginia University’s National Center for Coal and Energy Research)

The mining industry is truly international—not only are mining operations carried out globally, but there is considerable capital, knowledge, and mined-materials flow across international boundaries to satisfy the global demand for mined and processed materials. The coal industries in different countries have much in common, particularly with regard to health, safety, and environmental issues. Because of these similarities, there is considerable exchange of research results—developments in one country are quickly incorporated into mining practices in other countries. This global interaction is particularly facilitated by mining equipment manufacturers. The consolidation of coal mining equipment manufacturers over the past three decades and the broad applicability of equipment across a range of mining situations have led manufacturers to work with mining clients and their own suppliers to develop evolutionary improvements to their products. In addition, equipment manufacturers invest substantial resources to improve the durability and reliability of mining equipment. For example, one leading mining equipment manufacturer indicated that its global engineering budget was approximately $40 million, with about 25 percent spent on engineering development activities that are related mostly to evolutionary advances and software development

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Some equipment manufacturers have worked in partnership with government agencies and mining companies to develop and demonstrate new concepts (e.g., three major equipment manufacturers are members of the Australian CRCMining program; see Box 4.3). For some equipment manufacturers, mining equipment is only one of many product lines. The applied engineering research and development work that they conduct is generally fundamental to their production and materials processes, and the research is often proprietary and not generally available to the wider industry

Cross-industry research under the aegis of coal companies or coal industry organizations, or with support from industry organizations, appears to be minimal. There are no longer organizations such as Bituminous Coal Research, Inc. (BCR) that used to work on coal mining and coal preparation issues. Instead, industry’s emphasis is on improvements to existing technologies—the remarkable increases of mining productivity since the mid-1970s (Figure 4.4) are a testimony to the development and adoption of evolutionary improvements in mining technology and practices. Several coal companies work in partnership with government agencies and academic institutions on coal mining research projects. The importance to researchers of access to operating mines and input from mining company experts is particularly worth noting

One model for cooperative government-academia-industry research is that of the Australian Coal Association Research Program (ACARP).1 ACARP, which began in 1992, is funded by a 5 cent per tonne tax paid by the Australian black coal industry that generates $A10 million-$A15 million annually. The funds are paid to Australian Coal Research Ltd. (ACR), a company established by the industry to manage all aspects of the program. Each year, ACARP’s industry-chaired committees select approximately 80 research projects for funding from about 300 proposals submitted under a competitive solicitation. The amount of leveraged matching funding for these projects from sources outside ACARP has been at an average ratio (external:ACARP) of more than 2.5:1 over the last three years. The research projects, which are conducted by university, industrial, and government-affiliated researchers, are monitored by industry representatives

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

The Australian government also supports the Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) for Mining (CRCMining),2 an incorporated entity created in 2003. CRCMining is projected to receive $A27 million in funding from the Australian government over seven years. This will be matched by about another $A100 million of funding from 12 industry and 4 university partners. CRCMining is one of about 60 CRCs in Australia, 8 of which are concerned with mining and energy. Each CRC is incorporated and operates under a formal agreement with the Australian government of up to seven year’s duration. Under this agreement, the government agrees to provide a certain level of funding each year to the CRC, and CRC participants agree to undertake certain activities and contribute specified personnel and resources

The National Mining Association (NMA) earlier outlined its vision and goals for the Mining IOF program (NMA, 1998). This recognized the importance of developing research priorities for new technologies and joint sponsorships of chosen projects, and resulted in an NMA-DOE partnership that supported several roadmaps as part of the Mining IOF program. Three specific roadmaps (Mining Industry Roadmap for Crosscutting Technologies, 1999; Mineral Processing Technology Roadmap, 2000; and Exploration and Mining Technology Roadmap, 2002) resulted in projects funded by DOE

A range of factors increase health and safety risks to the coal mining workforce, including the introduction of new equipment and systems; the commencement of mining in virgin areas; the infusion of new workers; and the mining of multiple seams, seams that are thinner, thicker, or deeper than those customarily mined at present and new seams that underlie or overlie previously mined-out seams. All of these factors are likely to apply to some degree in future mines, irrespective of whether the higher production scenarios suggested in some forecasts eventuate. If they do materialize, then these risks are likely to become even more pronounced

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

There are major knowledge gaps and technology needs in the areas of survival, escape, communications systems (both surface-to-underground and underground-to-underground), and emergency preparedness and rescue. Additional risk factors that are likely to apply in the deeper mines of the future are the potential hazards related to methane control, dust control, ignition sources, fires, and explosions

Greater understanding and better prediction of strata behavior to prevent unanticipated12 roof collapse, particularly problems associated with roof and side fall during thick seam extraction, are essential for maintaining and improving worker safety

Recommendation: Health and safety research and development should be expanded to anticipate increased hazards in future coal mines. These R&D efforts should emphasize improved methane control, improved mine ventilation, improved roof control, reduced repetitive and traumatic injuries, reduced respiratory diseases, improved escape and rescue procedures, improved communications systems, and research to reduce explosions and fires. This should be coupled with improved training of the mining workforce in all aspects of mine safety. R&D should also be directed toward lowering the exposure of mine workers to hazardous conditions, particularly through expanded use of remote sensing and the automation of mining operations

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Most mining health and safety research by the federal government is carried out by the Mining Program at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Technology-related activities in the Mine Safety and Health Administration are limited to technical support and training services for its personnel and those from the mining industry. With NIOSH carrying out the research needed to improve mine safety and to support MSHA’s regulatory role, these two agencies play a vital role in coal mine health and safety. The committee estimates that the enhanced health and safety program proposed here will require an additional $35 million to provide total annual R&D funding of approximately $60 million and recommends that NIOSH continue as the lead agency with enhanced coordination with MSHA and industry

Coal mining has environmental impacts on air, water, and land. Actions taken to meet federal and state environmental regulations already respond to and ameliorate many of these effects. However, there are gaps in the knowledge base related to a range of environmental issues that need to be addressed, and future changes in environmental requirements may drive the need for new coal mining and beneficiation technology

As mining extracts coal from deeper and operationally more difficult seams by both surface and underground methods, it is likely that many existing environmental issues and concerns will be exacerbated. New concerns, particularly related to greater disturbance of hydrologic systems, ground subsidence, and waste management at mines and preparation plants, are likely to arise

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Inadequate understanding of post-mining strata behavior and the associated hydrologic consequences of mining in both surface and underground mines affects mine permitting, mine development, environmental mitigation, and post-mining land use, including use for waste management

The regulatory environment (framed by such statutes as the Clean Air and Clean Water Acts) and technical support programs administered by both state and federal agencies, and implemented by mining companies through their compliance practices, are inadequately supported by existing research programs

Recommendation: Additional research is needed to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts associated with past, existing, and future coal mining and processing. Research activities should focus particularly on developing techniques to mitigate the alteration and collapse of strata overlying mined areas, to model the hydrological impacts of coal mining, to improve mine mapping and void detection, to improve the stability of

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Both the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement and the Environmental Protection Agency, although primarily regulatory agencies, fund limited R&D activities in support of their missions. The committee estimates that annual funding of approximately $70 million will be required to conduct the research necessary to adequately respond to the environmental impacts of past, existing, and future mining operations. The committee recommends that OSM should be the lead agency in this effort, and it should coordinate closely with related EPA and state research activities

The productivity of U.S. coal mines increased two- to three fold in the past three decades, largely due to evolutionary improvements, most notably the introduction of longwall mining in eastern underground mines and the development of large surface operations in the West. The sustained production and productivity increases that followed these changes resulted from incremental improvements in equipment and mining practices by mining companies and equipment manufacturers, and there has been little research and development on truly advanced mining technologies

The development of advanced technologies, such as thin-seam underground mining technology or dry processing methods for western surface-mined coals, will present opportunities to recover a significant portion of potentially recoverable coal that currently is not extracted and may be permanently lost. In situ extraction or utilization methods, while they have not found broad application in the past, may become attractive as more easily mined reserves are exhausted. Many advanced mining technologies with the potential to reduce mine hazards, such as remote sensing, continuous monitoring at the mine face, remote control, and autonomous systems, also have the potential to increase production and productivity and improve resource recovery. Although the national coal resource is truly vast, the economically recoverable reserve base will depend on mining costs that in turn are determined by labor, environmental, and technological factors

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Small percentage increases in coal recovery through improved coal preparation processes and improved mining methods, perhaps including in situ extraction, have the potential to significantly expand economically recoverable reserves of both eastern and western coals. The development of these technologies, increasingly needed as coal reserve quality decreases over time, will help to maximize utilization of the nation’s coal resource

closely with suppliers and the larger mining clients on evolutionary product developments. However, there is little evidence of the efficient transfer of technologies from outside the mining industry. This is at least partly due to the relatively small market that the coal mining industry represents to potential technology suppliers and the scarcity of coal mining research at academic institutions and national laboratories

Recommendation: There should be renewed support for advanced coal mining and processing research and development to optimize use of the nation’s coal resources by increasing the amount of coal that is economically minable through technological advances that accommodate health, safety, and environmental requirements. The focus of this R&D should be on increased integration of modern technology in the extraction and processing phases of coal production, with particular emphasis on emerging advances in materials, sensors, and controls; monitoring; and automated mining systems

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

Although there is currently little federal funding for advanced mining technology to improve resource recovery, in the past the Department of Energy successfully partnered with the National Mining Association as part of the Mining Industry of the Future program. In addition, there are government-industry-academic cooperative models in other countries that are successful in directing and funding mining research (e.g., see Box 4.3). Research to develop advanced mining technologies requires not only cooperation among relevant federal agencies, but also participation by academic institutions as well as funding, guidance, and technology transfer by industry. The committee estimates that advanced coal mining and processing R&D will require a total of approximately $60 million per year and recommends that this funding should comprise $30 million in federal support, with cost sharing from non-federal sources. The DOE Office of Fossil Energy should be the lead federal agency and should coordinate with the National Science Foundation, OSM, NIOSH, academic institutions, and the coal industry to ensure that all research activities carefully consider the environmental, reclamation, and health and safety aspects of coal mining

Coal will continue to provide a major portion of energy requirements in the United States for at least the next several decades. It is imperative that accurate information describing the amount, location, and quality of the coal resources and reserves be available to fulfill energy needs. It is also important that the United States extract its coal resources efficiently, safely, and in an environmentally responsible manner. A renewed focus on federal support for coal-related research, coordinated across agencies and with the active participation of the states and industrial sector, is a critical element for each of these requirements

Coal focuses on the research and development needs and priorities in the areas of coal resource and reserve assessments, coal mining and processing, transportation of coal and coal products, and coal utilization

4 coal mining and processing | coal: research and

You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website

coal beneficiation process diagram

Economic and operating conditions make it important to provide a simple, low cost, efficient method for recovering fine coal from washery waste. Not only is the water pollution problem a serious one, but refuse storage and disposal in many areas is becoming limited and more difficult. Many breakers and washeries efficiently handle the coarser sizes, but waste the coal fines. This problem is assuming major importance due to the increase in the amount of coal fines being produced by the mechanization of coal mining

Flotation offers a very satisfactory low-cost method for recovering a fine, low ash, clean coal product at a profit. Often this fine coal, when combined with the cleaned, coarser fractions, results in an over-all superior product, low in ash and sulphur, giving maximum profit returns per unit mined

coal beneficiation process diagram

Generally a very simple flotation flowsheet, as illus­trated above, will be suitable for recovering the low ash coal present in waste from coarse recovery washeries. Assuming the fines are approximately all minus 20 mesh and in a water slurry of about 20% to 25% solids, the first step is to condition with a reagent which will promote flotation of the fine coal particles. Kerosene, fuel oil, coal tars and similar hydrocarbons will accomplish this effectively when added to the coal slurry in a (Patented) Super Agitator and Conditioner. A frothing agent such as pine oil, alcohol frother, or cresylic acid added to the slurry as it discharges from the conditioner is also used. The separation between low ash coal and high ash refuse is efficiently accomplished in a “Sub-A” Flotation Machine. As the amount of clean coal floated represents a high percentage of the initial feed, provision is made to remove the cleaned coal from both sides of the cell. Fine coal is dewatered with a Disc Filter, as the Flotation Machine can usually be regulated to produce a product low in ash and with proper density for direct filtration

It is highly desirable to extend the range of coal flotation to include the coarser Sizes. Not only will this simplify general washery practice but will result in a superior product having desirable marketing charac­teristics for metallurgical and steam power plant uses. It is now possible to efficiently recover coal by flota­tion through the entire size range beginning at about 4 mesh down to fines, minus 200 mesh

With the flowsheet as outlined for coarse coal recovery, the feed is first deslimed for removal of high ash slimes and excess water. The hydroclassifier underflow is conditioned at 40% to 45% solids with kerosene or fuel oil and diluted with water to 20%-25% solids prior to flotation. If pyrite and coarse high ash material are present, it is often helpful to pass the conditioned pulp over a Mineral Jig for removal of a portion of these impurities. Hindered settling in the jig against a rising pulsating water column classifies out the high gravity impurities and eliminates them from the flotation circuit. Water requirements are low and feed density to flotation can easily be maintained at the proper level

coal beneficiation process diagram

The “Sub-A” (Lasseter Type) Flotation Machine has proved successful for treating coarse coal with the flowsheet as indicated. A frother of the alcohol type is generally added to the flotation feed after conditioning with kerosene. Floated coal will collect in a heavy dense matte at the cell surface and as raked off, will contain up to 60% solids. Mechanical dewatering is usually not necessary. Natural drainage, dewatering on porous bottom screw conveyors, and vibrating screen dewatering are all being used successfully in coarse coal recovery circuits

Flotation, with the “Sub-A” gravity flow principle, provides the ideal way to treat coal fines even as coarse as —3/16” top size. According to reports from plants operating for the production of metallurgi­cal coke, each percent ash in the coal carries a penalty of 2$ per ton of coal. Thus there is a considerable margin for operating costs in a fine flotation cleaning method that will materially lower the ash of the cleaned coal. Further convincing evidence that ash re­moval from coal is of major importance is found in the weekly magazine of metal working, Steel, January 29, 1951, reporting on a modern coal preparation plant. The report states that a 1% reduction in ash content of coal means a reduction of 30 cents in cost of pig iron. One large plant reduces the ash from 7% to 3.5% by cleaning, thus cutting the cost of producing pig iron a dollar or more per ton

A coal flotation machine must not only be able to handle a coarse as well as a fine feed, but it must also be simple to operate. Gravity circulation permits the treatment of difficult unclassified feeds

coal beneficiation process diagram

High cost of mining makes it very important from a profit standpoint to recover all of the low ash coal, both coarse and fines. With the present trend toward mechanization, more fines are produced in mining. In many operations it is no longer economical to discard these fines to waste even though ash contiminants render the fines unmarketable without additional cleaning

Water conservation, stream pollution and refuse storage are also factors which must be taken into consideration along with marketing requirements for the clean coal product. Flotation offers an efficient and low-cost method for recovering coal fines at a profit. In many cases floated coal fines can be blended with the coarser fractions without affecting ash, moisture or size limitations. This is being done successfully in coking coal operations. Fine coal is also being used extensively in steam plants for electric power generation

The above flowsheets are based on existing small coal flotation plants. They illustrate clearly the simplicity and feasibility of adding  “Sub-A” Coal Flotation as an additional process to small washing plants

coal beneficiation process diagram

Because of its limited output, treatment must be very simple and operating costs kept to a minimum. At the washery, illustrated by flowsheet “A,” the entire mine output is sold for coking coal. Mining the relatively narrow seam produces a product with 15 to 20% ash, although the coal when cleaned will carry only 3 to 3½% ash. This low ash coal brings a premium price, so it is an economic necessity to remove the impurities

The mine run coal is crushed to a size for coking coal requirements. The entire production is treated over a coal jig which removes as waste primarily the coarse refuse. The coarse clean coal passes over the jig along with the fines and is elevated to a wedge bar stationary screen with 1 millimeter openings for dewatering. The coarse clean coal passing over the screen discharges by gravity into a storage bin. The fine coal, along with clay and its high ash fractions and water averaging 15 to 18% solids, discharges by gravity into a (Patented) Super Agitator and Conditioner. Kerosene and pine oil are added and the conditioned slurry or pulp then is introduced into the “Sub-A” Coal Flotation Machine

The low ash coal product removed from the “Sub-A” Coal Flotation Cells contains 35 to 40% solids and is transferred to the coarse coal storage bin through a Vertical Concentrate pump. The flotation coal mixes with the coarse product which allows for adequate drainage and minimum loss of fines

coal beneficiation process diagram

In the operation as illustrated by flowsheet “B,” approximately 15 tons per hour of coal flotation concentrate are produced. This installation requires more control to meet specifications and consequently a more elaborate system is necessary

Screen undersize and water containing fines from the gravity separator are thickened in a centrifugal or cyclone separator to give the proper water-to-solids ratio for subsequent treatment. The effluent from the cyclone contains collodial slimes and high ash fines in addition to the bulk of the water from screening and gravity systems. Thickened coal fines from the cyclone pass over a Mineral Jig which removes a high ash refuse and free pyrite down as fine as 150 to 200 mesh

The coal fines passing over the Jig are conditioned with reagents in the (Patented) Super Agitator and Conditioner and subjected to flotation treatment in a 6-cell “Sub-A” Coal Flotation Machine at approximately 20-25% solids. Double overflow of froth is used due to the low ratio of concentration and the high weight percentage of floatable coal recovered by flotation

coal beneficiation process diagram

The coal flotation product at 35% solids is dewatered by a Disc Filter. Coarse coal from the gravity section and fine coal from the flotation section are blended and transferred by rail to the coke plant

In some cases the coarse and fine coal are dewatered by Dillon Vibrating Screens. The coarser fractions of coal are first added to the screen to form a bed and flotation fines are added on top of this bed for dewatering. Where operating conditions are favorable, this system is preferred to other means of dewatering as it assures a well blended product low in moisture and uniform in ash content

Effluent from the cyclone, high ash jig refuse and flotation tailing refuse are thickened in a Thickener to conserve and re-use water. Thickener refuse is disposed of without contaminating local streams

coal beneficiation process diagram

“Sub-A” Coal Flotation with its gravity flow principle and selective action makes it possible to recover low ash coal from 1/8” down to minus 200 mesh. If an appreciable amount of recoverable coal is plus 20 mesh in size, the “Sub-A” Lasseter Type Coal Flotation Machine should be used. It is no longer necessary to use a complex system for fine coal recovery. Flotation will effectively handle the entire fine size range at low cost and produce a low ash marketable product

In the washing of coal the problem exists in having to clean the fines in an economical and efficient manner without an excessively complex flowsheet. Mechanized mining creates fines not considered as problems in older methods of selective mining and underground loading. In many cases the minus 1/8 inch fines require cleaning to lower the ash content and frequently it is also necessary to reclaim all of the water for re-use in the washing system. Most plants use a closed water system to conserve water and comply with anti-stream pollution regulations

Flotation offers a means for handling the entire size range minus 1/8 inch x 0. Efficient recovery of the fines at a low ash content is accomplished in a relatively simple flowsheet. The substantial amount of coarser sizes in the concentrates aids in subsequent dewatering either by vacuum filters or dewatering screens

coal beneficiation process diagram

In the flowsheet shown mine run coal after proper size reduction treatment is passed over heavy duty screening equipment to remove the minus 1/8 inch fines. Wet screening down to 10 or 12 mesh offers no particular problem. Water sprays are generally employed to thoroughly wash the fines from the coarse coal and prepare it for treatment. A surge tank or a thickener ahead of the conditioning and flotation section may be necessary to provide a uniform feed rate both as to solids content and density

The coarse coal is washed and up graded in a conventional manner through heavy media or coal jigs to produce a clean coal and a coarse refuse. Any fines due to degradation through the coarse cleaning system is collected, partially dewatered and combined with the fines from the screening section

Minus 1/8 inch x 0 coal fines are conditioned with the required amount of fuel oil or kerosene (approximately 1 to 3 lbs/ton) to thoroughly activate the low ash coal particles and render them floatable. Density in the conditioner should be as high as possible; however, for the open circuit system as shown it very likely will be maintained between 20 to 25% solids. A Super Agitator and Conditioner is preferred for this service since any froth accumulation on the surface is drawn down the standpipe and thoroughly dispersed throughout the pulp. This also aids in the most effective use of reagents

coal beneficiation process diagram

The discharge from the conditioner at 20% solids is floated in a “Sub-A” Flotation Machine of the free flow type for handling coarse solids. Some dilution water may be necessary to maintain the feed density at 20% solids. A frother such as pine oil, cresylic acid, or one of the higher alcohols is added to the head of the flotation circuit at the rate of about 0.5-1.5 lbs/ton

In the primary flotation section a high recovery of the coal fines minus 28 mesh is secured. In addition some of the more readily floatable coarse coal, low in ash, is also recovered. However, ability of the machine to handle all 1/8 inch feed permits recovery of coal over wide range of mesh sizes, thus improving filtering and handling characteristics. This coal, if not clean enough, is refloated in cleaner cells and middlings are recycled back to the feed. Clean coal will contain about 35% solids which is ideal for vacuum filtration. A Agitator Type Disc Filter is used as solids are effectively kept in suspension giving uniform distribution of cake for greater dewatering

Generally the refuse from the primary flotation cells will contain a very high ash content in the -28 or-35 mesh size fraction. By screening the refuse the excess water and undersize high ash fines are eliminated while screen oversize is re-treated by flotation. This screening need not be highly efficient since only a partial sizing is satisfactory. Handling the coal in this manner reduces size degradation to a minimum

coal beneficiation process diagram

The coarse coal from the foregoing dewatering and screening step is repulped to about 40% solids and conditioned with reagents. The conditioned pulp after dilution to 25 to 28% solids is floated in a second bank of flotation cells. The coarse coal in the absence of fines will form a dense, heavy matte at the surface of the cells. For this type of flotation, slow moving rakes are provided to remove the coal as final concentrate. This clean coal will generally contain over 50% solids, thus making it ideal for dewatering over vibrating screens or on a horizontal or top feed vacuum filter. In some plants where moisture is not too critical a screw conveyor with wedge bar bottom sections is used for the dewatering step

The refuse from the coarse coal flotation cells may still contain some coal not responsive to flotation recovery but low enough in ash to be saved. In such cases the refuse can be screened and the oversize fraction jigged or tabled. The tonnage at this point is usually only a very small percentage of the initial fines so the equipment requirements for this gravity section are moderate

All refuse in the 1/8 inch x 0 coal recovery section is collected in a thickener for water reclamation. The thickened refuse or sludge underflow may be pumped to waste ponds, or if water is in short supply, filtration of this refuse may be necessary

coal beneficiation process diagram

Coal flotation concentrates produced in this primary section are filtered direct and the filtrate is re-cycled back to the flotation cells for re-use. This filtrate is high in reagent content and is particularly useful as dilution water. Generally the density of the coal from the primary cells will contain about 35% solids and thus does not require thickening ahead of filtration

Coal from the coarse flotation and the gravity section, if employed, can be readily dewatered over screens or horizontal or top feed filters. In some cases it may be possible to divert part or all of this coal to the filter handling the fines provided it is equipped with proper agitation equipment and a high displacement vacuum system. Some of the new synthetic filter bag fabrics such as Saran and nylon materially aid in securing high filter rates and low final moisture content

“Sub-A” Coal Flotation Systems have been successful for recovery of both coarse and fine coal. It is important, however, to employ a two-stage circuit for maximum efficiency in saving the plus 28 mesh fraction which is normally the most difficult to float. The development of the free flow and Type M flotation cells offers a means for efficiently handling coarse coal in a size range heretofore reserved for other more complex systems

coal beneficiation process diagram

Ash and sulphur content is desired to be as low as, or lower than, for regular lump coal. Generally, for anthracite, not over 13 per cent ash is desired. Bituminous coal operations usually limit ash to not more than 8 per cent in the fines

Flotation or gravity concentration are generally applied only to washery fines that otherwise would not be saleable and which generally have to be impounded to prevent stream pollution. Because of the low price secured, the expense of treatment must be held to a minimum. Pyrite and coarser ash-forming content may need to be removed by gravity treatment

Kerosene or fuel oil with pine oil, or alcohol, frother are the more common reagents used. Cresylic acid frother may sometimes be advantageous. Fine pyrite, if free, may be rejected with the high-ash refuse by addition of lime to the flotation feed

coal beneficiation process diagram

Under proper conditions, coal as coarse as 10 mesh may be effectively floated with kerosene and pine oil. For this coarse flotation it is generally necessary to classify out the high-ash —200 mesh slimes ahead of flotation

environmental, health and safety guidelines for coal

Coal miners use giant machines to remove coal from the ground. They use two methods: surface or underground mining. Many U.S. coal beds are very near the ground’s surface, and about two-thirds of coal production comes from surface mines. Modern mining methods allow us to easily reach most of our coal reserves. Due to growth in surface mining and improved mining technology, the amount of coal produced by one miner in one hour has more than tripled since 1978

Surface mining is used to produce most of the coal in the U.S. because it is less expensive than underground mining. Surface mining can be used when the coal is buried less than 200 feet underground. In surface mining, giant machines remove the top-soil and layers of rock to expose large beds of coal. Once the mining is finished, the dirt and rock are returned to the pit, the topsoil is replaced, and the area is replanted. The land can then be used for croplands, wildlife habitats, recreation, or offices or stores

environmental, health and safety guidelines for coal

Underground mining, sometimes called deep mining, is used when the coal is buried several hundred feet below the surface. Some underground mines are 1,000 feet deep. To remove coal in these underground mines, miners ride elevators down deep mine shafts where they run machines that dig out the coal

After coal comes out of the ground, it typically goes on a conveyor belt to a preparation plant that is located at the mining site. The plant cleans and processes coal to remove dirt, rock, ash, sulfur, and other unwanted materials, increasing the heating value of the coal

Recent Post